Compressor power calculator

Ideal-gas isentropic compression power from suction/discharge pressure, suction temperature and flow — then isentropic and motor efficiency stacked on top to get shaft and electrical power, plus displacement sizing from volumetric efficiency.

Isentropic compression (verified thermodynamics) Efficiency stack Free, no sign-up

Compression data

Inputs only — every result is on the right.

Gas

Auto-filled: rough typical k and molar mass for R410A vapour — not a verified per-condition value. Edit if you have a more specific figure.

Pressure & temperature

Flow

Efficiency

Pressure ratio
Suction density
Isentropic discharge temp.
Mass flow
Volumetric flow (suction)
Isentropic power
Shaft power
Electrical power
Required displacement

Link copied — it reopens with these exact inputs.

How to use this calculator

  1. Pick the refrigerant/gas — it fills in k and molar mass below, editable.
  2. Enter suction and discharge pressure, and suction temperature.
  3. Enter the flow, either as mass flow or volumetric flow at suction conditions.
  4. Enter isentropic and motor efficiency.
  5. Read the ideal, shaft and electrical power, plus displacement if volumetric efficiency was given.

What this calculates — and its one big limitation

This calculates ideal-gas isentropic compression work, the standard textbook thermodynamic reference point for compressor sizing, treating the refrigerant vapour as an ideal gas:

R = R₀ / M specific gas constant cp = k·R / (k−1) specific heat at constant pressure w_s = cp·T₁·[ (P₂/P₁)^((k−1)/k) − 1 ] specific isentropic work T₂s = T₁·(P₂/P₁)^((k−1)/k) isentropic discharge temperature ρ₁ = P₁ / (R·T₁) suction density (ideal gas)

This is not a real refrigerant-cycle simulation. Real refrigerant vapour near saturation deviates from ideal-gas behaviour, sometimes significantly — an actual cycle calculation needs real enthalpy data from that refrigerant's own equation of state, which this site has no verified source for (the same limitation noted on the Refrigerant Pipe Pressure Drop and COP / EER calculators). Ideal-gas isentropic work is nonetheless a genuinely standard first-pass estimate used throughout compressor engineering, not a shortcut invented for this tool — treat the result as a solid order-of-magnitude reference point, not a substitute for a manufacturer's selection software.

Where k and molar mass come from

Picking a refrigerant auto-fills k (the isentropic exponent, cp/cv) and molar mass with rough typical values for that refrigerant's vapour near ordinary operating conditions — the same confidence tier as the density/viscosity typical values on the Refrigerant Pipe Pressure Drop Calculator: a reasonable starting point, not a verified per-condition figure. Molar mass is the more solid of the two (it's a fixed molecular property); k varies somewhat with temperature and pressure even for the same refrigerant. Edit either if you have more specific data.

Efficiency stack: isentropic → shaft → electrical

Isentropic power is a lower bound — a real compressor always needs more shaft power to do the same compression, captured by isentropic efficiency (typically roughly 60-80% for reciprocating and scroll compressors, higher for well-matched screw compressors, lower near very high pressure ratios). Shaft power becomes electrical power via the motor's own efficiency (typically 90-96% for a reasonably modern motor). Both are editable inputs, not looked-up values — they depend on the specific compressor and motor.

Displacement sizing

If you enter a volumetric efficiency, the required compressor displacement is the suction-side volumetric flow divided by that efficiency — the swept volume flow rate a reciprocating or scroll compressor would need to deliver the required mass flow, accounting for re-expansion and leakage losses that mean actual delivered flow is always less than geometric swept volume would suggest.

Isentropic compression uses the ideal-gas relations above — standard, verifiable textbook thermodynamics, but not a substitute for a real refrigerant-cycle simulation using actual equation-of-state data. k and molar mass are rough typical values per refrigerant, editable, not from a verified per-condition source. Isentropic, motor and volumetric efficiency are user-supplied inputs specific to the actual equipment — no default is looked up for you. Provided for engineering guidance — verify against manufacturer selection software for actual equipment sizing.